The Regional Commissions Reference
An independent guide to regional development and governance bodies

Home › Directory

Reference directory

A directory of regional commissions

“Regional commission” is not one organisation but a whole family of them, at two very different scales. At the top are the nine federal regional commissions and authorities. Beneath them sit hundreds of state and sub-state bodies — and in several states those bodies are, quite literally, named “Regional Commission.” This directory maps both tiers, with verified counts and links to the primary sources behind them.

How this directory is organised

Federal regional commissions and authorities

These are the best-documented regional commissions in the United States: standing federal–state partnerships created by statute, each covering a defined multi-state region. Six are active; three have been authorised in law but are not yet operating. Full detail is on each profile and on the federal commissions overview.

Commission or authorityRegionStatus
Appalachian Regional Commission 13 states, 423 counties Active
Delta Regional Authority 8 states of the Mississippi Delta Active
Denali Commission Rural and remote Alaska Active
Northern Border Regional Commission Rural ME, NH, VT, NY Active
Southwest Border Regional Commission Border counties of AZ, CA, NM, TX Active
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission 7 southeastern states Active
Great Lakes Authority Great Lakes watershed, 8 states Not yet active
Mid-Atlantic Regional Commission DE and parts of MD, PA Not yet active
Southern New England Regional Commission RI, MA, part of CT Not yet active

State bodies literally named “Regional Commission”

The federal commissions are not the only bodies to use the name. Several states run their own networks of multi-county planning and development organisations, and in a handful of them those organisations are officially titled “Regional Commission.” These are creatures of state law and local membership — entirely separate from the federal commissions, and from one another.

State system

Georgia

All 12 of Georgia's regional bodies are officially titled “Regional Commission” — the cleanest example in the country.

State system

Virginia

Six of the 21 planning district commissions have adopted the name “Regional Commission” under a statute that expressly allows the substitution.

State system

Vermont

Four regional planning commissions carry the name — Bennington County, Windham, Mount Ascutney, and Two Rivers-Ottauquechee.

State systems, A–Z

Below the federal tier, nearly every state operates some network of regional councils, planning commissions, or development districts. The names differ from state to state — council of governments, area development district, regional planning commission, regional commission — but the work is broadly the same: multi-jurisdiction planning, grant administration, and technical help for local governments. The table lists the dominant system in each state we were able to verify, with its count and type.

StateSystemCountWhat they are
Georgia Regional Commissions 12 Statewide multi-county planning & development; membership is mandatory for every county and city
Virginia Planning District Commissions 21 Planning district commissions; 6 use the name “Regional Commission,” 1 “Regional Council”
Vermont Regional Planning Commissions 11 Political subdivisions of the state; several styled “Regional Commission”
Connecticut Councils of Governments 9 Regional COGs covering all 169 municipalities
Tennessee Development Districts 9 Multi-county development districts
Kentucky Area Development Districts 15 Multi-county planning & development; all 120 counties
West Virginia Regional Planning & Development Councils 11 Regions I–XI
Massachusetts Regional Planning Agencies 13 Mixed names: regional planning commissions, COGs, and area commissions
Texas Councils of Governments 24 Voluntary regional councils; all 254 counties
Michigan Regional Planning Agencies 14 State-designated regional planning agencies and COGs
North Carolina Councils of Governments 16 Voluntary regional councils (formerly “lead regional organizations”)
Maine Regional Councils 10 Mixed COGs, planning commissions, and economic-development councils

This is a representative selection, not a complete census: it covers the states with a clean, single, verifiable statewide system. Some states — Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York among them — run several overlapping networks at once (transportation planning organisations, federally tied development districts, and state economic-development regions), so no single number fully describes them. Those are discussed on the state & local bodies page.

The national picture

Taken together, this sub-state layer is far larger than the federal one. The national membership bodies that represent these organisations put the totals in the hundreds:

Type of bodyRough national count
Regional councils / councils of governmentsmore than 500
Regional development organisationsmore than 500
Metropolitan planning organisations (MPOs)about 410
Economic development districts (EDDs)over 400

These categories overlap heavily — a single organisation is often a council of governments, a metropolitan planning organisation, and a development district all at once — so the figures cannot simply be added together. They are best read as four different lenses on the same broad field of a few hundred to roughly a thousand distinct bodies. Counts are drawn from the national associations of regional councils and development organisations; see the resources page for links.

A note on names

Do not read too much into the label. A body called a “regional commission” in Georgia, a “planning district commission” in Virginia, and a “council of governments” in Connecticut may be doing near-identical work; conversely, a state “regional commission” and a federal regional commission share a name but almost nothing else. Virginia makes the point plainly: its own statute lets a planning district commission simply adopt the name “regional commission” or “regional council” instead. The core explainer and the comparison page untangle which powers actually go with which body.

Disclaimer. An independent educational resource about regional development and governance bodies. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to any government agency or intergovernmental organisation. Counts and names reflect the public record and change over time; confirm any figure against the primary sources linked here.